Use of safety syringes for administration of local anaesthesia among a sample of UK primary care dental professionals.

Background: Safer sharps devices (SSDs) are commercially available and their use is mandated through UK legislation. Aim: To identify the current usage of SSDs in UK primary care dentistry. Method: A cross-sectional survey was administered to delegates at the 2017 British Dental Association (BDA) Conference and Exhibition in Manchester, and at the 2017 BDA Scottish Conference and Exhibition in Glasgow. The survey covered a range of questions relating to sharps injuries and use of traditional and safety syringes for delivery of local anaesthesia. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Version 22 (IBM Corp., 2013) and included chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Seven hundred and ninety-six delegates participated, of whom 396 (49.7%) were using safety syringes for delivery of local anaesthesia. Of the 166 participants who had experienced a sharps injury in the past year, 76 (45.8%) worked in facilities that most commonly used SSDs for delivery of local anaesthesia. Conclusion: Our results indicate that a significant number of dental practices in our sample have not adopted SSDs and suggest sharps injuries are still being sustained in some practices using SSDs. Further epidemiological research is required to provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of SSDs and reasons why SSDs have not been fully adopted in UK primary dental care.

The Flipped Classroom for pre-clinical dental skills teaching - a reflective commentary.

A Flipped Classroom method for teaching of adult practical pre-clinical dental skills was introduced to the BDS curriculum in Glasgow during the 2015/2016 academic session. This report provides a commentary of the first year of employing this method - from the identification of the need to optimise teaching resources, through the planning, implementation and development of the method, with an early indication of performance.

No longer 'written off' - times have changed for the BBV-infected dental professional.

There is a recognised potential risk of transmission of blood-borne viruses (BBVs) from infected healthcare workers to patients during exposure prone procedures (EPPs). The restrictions placed on performance of EPPs by infected clinicians in the UK have had a particularly significant impact on dentists because of the exposure-prone nature of most dental procedures and the difficulties in identifying alternative career pathways in the profession that do not involve EPPs. More recently, the significant positive impact of antiviral drugs on viral load, together with a re-categorisation of EPPs in dentistry have resulted in evolution of the guidance with a consequent significant improvement to the career prospects of dentists infected with BBVs. This paper provides an update for practitioners on the progress that has been made and outlines the current position with respect to practice restrictions.

Dentists, antibiotics and Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

Dentists prescribe significant volumes of antimicrobial drugs within primary care settings. There is good evidence that many of the prescriptions are not justified by current clinical guidance and that that there is considerable misuse of these drugs in dentistry. One of the risks associated with antibiotic administration is Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD), an entity of which many healthcare workers, including dentists, have little knowledge or understanding. This review seeks to identify the extent and nature of the problem and provides an up to date summary of current views on CDAD, with particular reference to community acquired disease. As for all healthcare workers, scrupulous attention to standard infection control procedures and reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing are essential to reduce the risks of CDAD, prevent emergence of further resistant strains of microorganisms and maintain the value of the arsenal of antibiotics currently available to us.

Want to do clinical research? Changes in the NHS mean there's never been a better time.

This article aims to explain the recent changes in the NHS research support system as it applies to dentistry; information that will be of value to all clinical academics and dentists considering taking part in research. The changes mean that investment goes where patient benefit research is happening. The system has put in place transparent mechanisms to reimburse NHS organisations including dental practices that take part in research and train clinicians in research skills. Through NHS investment in 'translational research', public funds are used directly to deliver improved and more cost effective patient care.

Design of dental surgeries in relation to instrument decontamination.

Recent guidelines advise that the decontamination of dental instruments should be undertaken outwith the treatment area. The aim of this study was to determine the physical area of rooms in dental surgeries that decontaminate instruments within and outwith the treatment area respectively, and other factors relating to practice layout and ventilation. Data were collected by interview and observation of dental healthcare workers in dental practice in Scotland, UK. Room layouts were recorded and measured at floor, benchtop and above benchtop heights. Thirteen surgeries with instrument decontamination processes occurring in the treatment area and seven surgeries with instrument decontamination outwith the treatment area were selected at random for detailed analysis of room dimensions. Of the 179 dental surgeries surveyed, 55% were located in converted residential premises and most practitioners (91%) did not share premises with other healthcare providers. The median number of rooms in the practices was 8 (range: 2-21) and the median number of surgeries present was 3 (range: 1-6). Regardless of whether instrument decontamination facilities were housed within the treatment area or not, the average treatment area room size for both was 15.8m(2) (range: 7.3-23.9) (P=0.862), with 20% of the room area available as work surfaces. The median size of the seven instrument decontamination rooms (local decontamination units) was 7.6m(2) (range: 2.9-16.0), with, on average, 63% of the room used for work surfaces. This survey suggests that the historical location of dental surgeries in converted residential properties places many restrictions on appropriate design for healthcare premises.

Salivary gland dysfunction ('dry mouth') in patients with cancer: a consensus statement.

A group of interested professionals was convened to develop some evidence-based recommendations on the management of salivary gland dysfunction (SGD) in oncology patients. A Medline search was performed to identify the literature on SGD. The abstracts of all identified papers were read, and the full texts of all relevant papers were reviewed. The evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network grading system for recommendations in evidence-based guidelines. The summary of the main recommendations are: (1) patients with cancer should be regularly assessed for SGD (grade of recommendation - D); (2) the management of SGD should be individualised (D); (3) consideration should be given to strategies to prevent the development of radiation-induced SGD (C); (4) consideration should be given to treatment of the cause(s) of the SGD (C); (5) the treatment of choice for the symptomatic management of SGD is use of an appropriate saliva stimulant (C); (6) consideration should be given to prevention of the complications of the SGD (D); (7) consideration should be given to treatment of the complications of the SGD (D); and (8) patients with SGD should be regularly reassessed (D).

Survey of the decontamination and maintenance of dental handpieces in general dental practice.

OBJECTIVES: To determine how dental handpieces are decontaminated and maintained in general dental practice. DESIGN: Observational survey. SETTING: The survey was carried out in general dental practice in Scotland. Survey visits ran from January 2003 until the end of March 2004. METHODS: Data were collected by interview and observation in 179 dental surgeries in Scotland. RESULTS: In virtually all surgeries, handpieces were cleaned before disinfection or autoclaving (99%; n = 177), most commonly by wiping the external surface with a cloth impregnated with disinfectant. Most surgeries lubricated their handpieces after cleaning and before sterilisation (91%; n = 162), although a number of surgeries (24%; n = 42) also lubricated their handpieces after sterilisation. In the majority (97%; n = 174) of dental surgeries, all handpieces were autoclaved after use, most frequently (89%; n = 160) in a bowl and instrument steriliser. In 38 surgeries (21%), handpieces were being wrapped (paper pouches) before sterilisation in bowl and instrument sterilisers. A minority of surgeries (20%; n = 36) had a dedicated handpiece for surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of dental handpieces are manually cleaned externally with a disinfectant impregnated cloth and processed in a type N (bowl and instrument) bench top steam steriliser. Handpieces are lubricated with non-water soluble lubricants at different stages of reprocessing, indicating clarification is required in this area. More work is required by manufacturers to establish a validated cleaning and lubrication process to facilitate the sterilisation of handpieces.

Management of infection control in dental practice.

This was an observational study in which the management policies and procedures associated with infection control and instrument decontamination were examined in 179 dental surgeries by a team of trained surveyors. Information relating to the management of a wide range of infection control procedures, in particular the decontamination of dental instruments, was collected by interview and by examination of practice documentation. This study found that although the majority of surgeries (70%) claimed to have a management policy on infection control, only 50% of these were documented. For infection control policies, 79% of surgeries had access to the British Dental Association Advice Sheet A12. Infection control policies were claimed to be present in 89% of surgeries, of which 62% were documented. Seventy-seven per cent of staff claimed to have received specific infection control training, but for instrument decontamination this was provided mainly by demonstration (97%) or observed practice (88%). Many dental nurses (74%) and dental practitioners (57%) did not recognise the symbol used to designate a single-use device. Audit of infection control or decontamination activities was undertaken in 11% of surgeries. The majority of surgeries have policies and procedures for the management of infection control in dental practice, but in many instances these are not documented. The training of staff in infection control and its documentation is poorly managed and consideration should be given to development of quality management systems for use in dental practice.

Mixed Candida albicans and Candida glabrata populations associated with the pathogenesis of denture stomatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Oral yeasts are an important component of the resident microbial ecology of the oral cavity, but they are also associated with various forms of oral candidosis, such as denture stomatitis. Although Candida albicans is the predominant oral fungal pathogen, other species may also play an integral role in pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to examine the mycological ecology in patients with denture stomatitis, using an improved sampling technique, to determine whether species diversity and species quantity were related to oral pathology. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients attending the Glasgow Dental Hospital were enrolled in this study following informed consent. A full clinical history was obtained, including details of their oral hygiene practices and the levels of erythema based on Newton's classification scale. Oral rinse, denture sonicate, and swab samples were taken, which were processed for quantitative and qualitative analysis of oral yeasts. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with no inflammation or Newton's Types I, II, and III were 31, 33, 25, and 14%, respectively. Denture sonication was a superior sampling procedure, with statistically greater quantities of yeasts isolated using this methodology (P < 0.01). The predominant oral yeasts isolated were C. albicans (75%) and Candida glabrata (30%), which were isolated in higher proportions in patients with the highest grades of inflammation (100 and 80%), and in combination from 80% of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that mixed C. albicans and C. glabrata biofilms may play an important role in the pathogenesis associated with severe inflammation in denture wearers.

Molecular identification of bacteria on the tongue dorsum of subjects with and without halitosis.

AIM: Compare the microbial profiles on the tongue dorsum in patients with halitosis and control subjects in a UK population using culture-independent techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Halitosis patients were screened according to our recently developed recruitment protocol. Scrapings from the tongue dorsum were obtained for 12 control subjects and 20 halitosis patients. Bacteria were identified by PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. RESULTS: The predominant species found in the control samples were Lysobacter-type species, Streptococcus salivarius, Veillonella dispar, unidentified oral bacterium, Actinomyces odontolyticus, Atopobium parvulum and Veillonella atypica. In the halitosis samples, Lysobacter-type species, S. salivarius, Prevotella melaninogenica, unidentified oral bacterium, Prevotella veroralis and Prevotella pallens were the most commonly found species. For the control samples, 13-16 (4.7-5.8%) of 276 clones represented uncultured species, whereas in the halitosis samples, this proportion increased to 6.5-9.6% (36-53 of 553 clones). In the control samples, 22 (8.0%) of 276 clones represented potentially novel phylotypes, and in the halitosis samples, this figure was 39 (7.1%) of 553 clones. CONCLUSIONS: The microflora associated with the tongue dorsum is complex in both the control and halitosis groups, but several key species predominate in both groups.

Sterilization of re-usable instruments in general dental practice.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the methods used for sterilisation of re-usable instruments in general dental practice, including the installation, commissioning and testing of benchtop steam sterilisers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational study in which the policies and procedures for sterilising instruments were viewed directly by trained surveyors at practice premises. Information relating to the installation, commissioning and testing of benchtop steam sterilisers was also collected by interview and observation of records. Data were recorded onto a standardised data collection form prepared for automated reading. RESULTS: Data were available fom 179 surgeries surveyed. Dental practices reprocess a range of instruments from critical to non-critical. The most common type of benchtop steam steriliser is a type N, or bowl and instrument (B&I) steriliser (88%). The remainder were type B, or vacuum sterilisers, though one surgery had access to a hot air steriliser. Sterilisers were usually installed by manufactures or suppliers (69%). Only 51% of sterilisers were tested on installation and 26% were commissioned, of which 38% were tested to SHTM 2010 standard. In most cases it was difficult to determine from the documentation available whether daily, weekly, quarterly or annual testing was undertaken in accordance with recognised standards. Written instructions for the operation of the steriliser were unavailable in 61% of practices. Insurance cover for pressure vessels was available in 79% of the surgeries with a B&I steriliser. In many instances there was inadequate separation of clean and dirty areas for segregating processed from unprocessed instruments. Ninety-six percent of surgeries did not have a procedure for the identification and traceability of instruments used on patients. There was no documentation of staff training in the use of sterilisers in 90% of surgeries. CONCLUSION: There has been significant uptake of the use of steam sterilisation to reprocess used dental instruments. However, there are significant shortcomings at various stages of the process, including installation, commissioning and periodic testing of sterilisers. These potentially compromise safety and the time, money and effort currently put into sterilising dental instruments. Complicit in these deficiencies are the manufacturers and suppliers of equipment that is inadequately installed and tested. There is a need for enhanced education and training in the use of sterilisers and the management of the process at all levels, from supplier to user. Improved access to appropriate technical advice on decontamination would also be a major benefit for the profession.

Oral health care and status of elderly care home residents in Glasgow.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate variations in reported oral health care provision and unmet dental need within a sample of care homes for the elderly in Glasgow. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: Two-phase study of a 50% random sample of 120 care homes (n = 60). Phase 1: telephone interviews with care home managers. Phase 2: oral examinations of residents and face-to-face interviews with care staff, in a sub-sample of 10 homes. CLINICAL SETTING: Care homes in Greater Glasgow. PARTICIPANTS: Residents and staff. RESULTS: Phase 1: data were collected from 58 of 60 care home managers approached (response rate: 97%). Oral assessment of residents on admission was reported for 78% of nursing homes and 24% of residential homes, and annual screening by a dentist for 85% and 76% respectively. Only 58% of nursing homes and 8% of residential homes had a formal mouth care policy. Staff training in mouth care was not universal and often carried out "in-house". All managers believed dental support was available when required. Phase 2: 288 oral examinations and 22 staff interviews took place within 10 homes selected. Examinations revealed high levels of oral disease. When interviewed, staff accepted that mouth care was within their remit but failed to document it within patient care plans. Further training on oral health and disease was requested from all levels of staff. CONCLUSIONS: Oral disease is common among elderly care home residents in Glasgow. Increased emphasis on implementation of standard oral care protocols and improved education of staff is essential if the oral health of elderly institutionalised residents is to improve.

Pre-sterilisation cleaning of re-usable instruments in general dental practice.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the policies, procedures, environment and equipment used for the cleaning of dental instruments in general dental practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 179 surgeries were surveyed. This was an observational based study in which the cleaning processes were viewed directly by a trained surveyor. Information relating to surgery policies and equipment was also collected by interview and viewing of records. Data were recorded onto a standardised data collection form prepared for automated reading. RESULTS: The BDA advice sheet A12 was available in 79% of surgeries visited. The most common method for cleaning dental instruments was manual washing, with or without the use of an ultrasonic bath. Automated washer disinfectors were not used by any surgery visited. The manual wash process was poorly controlled, with 41% of practices using no cleaning agent other than water. Only 2% of surgeries used a detergent formulated for manual washing of instruments. When using ultrasonic baths, the interval that elapsed between changes of the ultrasonic bath cleaning solution ranged from two to 504 hours (median nine hours). Fifty-eight percent of surgeries claimed to have a dedicated area for instrument cleaning, of which 80% were within the patient treatment area. However, in 69% of surgeries the clean and dirty areas were not clearly defined. Virtually all cleaning of dental instruments was undertaken by dental nurses. Training for this was provided mainly by demonstration and observed practice of a colleague. There was little documentation associated with training. Whilst most staff wore gloves when undertaking manual cleaning, 51% of staff did not use eye protection, 57% did not use a mask and 7% used waterproof overalls. CONCLUSIONS: In many dental practices, the cleaning of re-usable dental instruments is undertaken using poorly controlled processes and procedures, which increase the risk of cross infection. Clear and unambiguous advice must be provided to the dental team, especially dental nurses, on appropriate equipment, chemicals and environment for cleaning dental instruments. This should be facilitated by appropriate training programmes and the implementation of quality assurance procedures at each stage of the cleaning process.

A method for surveying instrument decontamination procedures in general dental practice.

OBJECTIVE: This paper describes an objective method for assessing the decontamination procedures used for reprocessing dental instruments in primary dental care facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised all general dental practitioners in Scotland with an NHS list number. A two-stage process was used to identify which surgeries were to be surveyed, using a proportional stratified random sampling method. First, practices were randomly selected in proportion to the distribution of practices within each of the health boards. Then, if there were more than one dentist within a selected practice, simple random sampling was used to identify a single dentist within the selected practice to be approached. The surgery that the dentist worked from and its associated decontamination facilities were the subject of the survey. A set of data collection forms provided questions designed to investigate compliance with extant guidance documents on decontamination. Specific training for the survey team members was provided during a three day course, to ensure consistency of approach. The data collection forms were piloted in 20 dental surgeries. RESULTS: A methodology was developed, which utilised both staff interviews and direct observation of decontamination processes. Data were collected on a set of 28 standard forms, which could be machine read. Three hundred and seventy-three dentists were selected at random from the dental practitioners list held by Practitioner Services, Scotland. One hundred and eighty-nine practitioners either declined to participate or could not be contacted at the address supplied. One hundred and eighty-four surgeries were surveyed, data were available for analysis from 179 sites. Data from five sites were rejected because of illegibility (three) and incomplete data (two). Each surgery survey was undertaken by a team of two surveyors, comprising one infection control/decontamination expert and one experienced dental practitioner. The survey team interviewed the dental practitioner and dental nurse, reviewed documentation relevant to the survey, directly observed decontamination practices and recorded the physical layout of the premises. CONCLUSION: The use of machine readable data collection forms, trained survey staff and direct observation of decontamination protocols provides a workable method for accurate collection of decontamination practice in primary care facilities.

Dental treatment and risk of variant CJD--a case control study.

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge of risk factors for variant CJD (vCJD) remains limited, but transmission of prion proteins via re-useable medical devices, including dental instruments, or enhanced susceptibility following trauma to the oral cavity is a concern. This study aimed to identify whether previous dental treatment is a risk factor for development of vCJD. DESIGN: Case control study. METHODS: Risk factor questionnaires completed by interview with relatives of 130 vCJD patients and with relatives of 66 community and 53 hospital controls were examined by a dental surgeon. Responses regarding dental treatments were analysed. RESULTS: We did not find a statistically significant excess of risk of vCJD associated with dental treatments with the exception of extractions in an unmatched analysis of vCJD cases with community controls (p = 0.02). However, this result may be explained by multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published study to date to examine potential links between vCJD and dental treatment. There was no convincing evidence found of an increased risk of variant CJD associated with reported dental treatment. However, the power of the study is restricted by the number of vCJD cases to date and does not preclude the possibility that some cases have resulted from secondary transmission via dental procedures. Due to the limitations of the data available, more detailed analyses of dental records are required to fully exclude the possibility of transmission via dental treatment.

Clinical examination of subjects with halitosis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and apply a detailed clinical protocol for screening and assessing subjects with a complaint of halitosis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Several methods were used to recruit subjects with a complaint of halitosis, including a newspaper advertisement. A definition of halitosis arising from within the oral cavity, which is not related to generalized chronic gingivitis, chronic periodontitis or pathology of the oral mucosa was used. An extensive list of exclusion criteria was applied at the initial visit. Eligible subjects were asked to follow strict instructions and complete a questionnaire prior to their second visit for data collection. The clinical examination consisted of an organoleptic assessment, Halimeter reading and periodontal examination. RESULTS: The best method of recruiting subjects was advertising. Of 66 individuals recruited, four failed to attend the screening visit and 25 were excluded. The main reasons for exclusion were poor oral hygiene and existing periodontal disease. Thirty-seven completed the full protocol, resulting in identification of 18 with halitosis and 19 controls. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the exclusion criteria resulted in significant attrition of eligible participants. Our results suggest that organoleptic assessment should be regarded as a useful standard for defining subjects with halitosis.